Tag Archives: critical appraisal

How to increase cardiovascular endurance by walking with restricted blood flow

This week for our sports science journal club Chris Brander looked at the paper below, which examined the effects of walking with blood flow restriction (BFR) on cardiovascular endurance in elite athletes.

Park S, Kim JK, Choi HM, Kim HG, Beekley MD, Nho H. Increase in maximal oxygen uptake following 2-week walk training with blood flow occlusion in athletes. European journal of applied physiology. 2010;109(4):591-600.

What was the aim of the paper?

Blood flow restriction (BFR) is a pretty novel exercise technique that is typically used in combination with strength exercise with light loads (20-30% of your predetermined 1 rep max). The benefit to applying a cuff or tourniquet around the limbs and reducing blood flow is an increase in muscle mass and strength similar to lifting much heavier loads (≥ 70% 1 rep max). This has huge implications for healthy populations including athletes, but also for populations that have limited strength capacities due to old age, musculoskeletal injuries, or muscle wasting due to inactivity or disease.

Alternatively, the use of BFR during aerobic modes of exercise such as walking and cycling has also been shown to be beneficial in improving gains in muscle strength and mass in both trained and untrained populations. While the research is not clear, the use of walk exercise with BFR may improve aspects of cardiovascular fitness; such as the maximal rate of oxygen consumption (VO2max), resting heart rate and resting blood pressure. So, the aim of this paper was to assess changes in cardiovascular fitness following a short duration training program in an athletic population.

What did the study involve?

Fourteen college male basketball players were recruited for the study and randomized into 2 training groups; walk training with BFR or walk training without BFR. The walk training consisted of 2 training sessions per day (morning and afternoon), 6 days per week, for 2 weeks (24 training sessions in total). Each training session involved walking for 5 sets of 3-minute bouts, interspersed with a 1-minute recovery period, at approximately 40% of their pre-determined VO2max.

For the BFR group a cuff was placed around the upper most portion of each leg and inflated to a pressure of 160-220 mmHg prior to each training session. The cuff remained inflated for the entire exercise bout including rest periods (22 minutes) and was immediately released at the end of the 5th set.

What were the main results?

The researchers found that following training, walking with BFR improved both VO2max (48.9 to 54.5 ml.kg.min – 11.6%) and VEmax (10.6%), whereas there was no change following walk training without BFR. Interestingly, unlike previous research, this study did not find any changes in either groups in lower body power (determined by a 30 second maximal Wingate sprint on a cycle ergometer), and no change in isokinetic knee extension strength.

What can we take from it?

This was the first study to show that a short period of low-intensity aerobic exercise with BFR improves cardiovascular endurance in elite athletes. What is really interesting about this study is that the improvement shown in VO2max was similar to other studies in athletes following high intensity exercise (i.e. 60-70% VO2max) over similar training periods.

From a coaching and practical point of view, research into the area of BFR is consistently demonstrating that we don’t have to train at high intensities or with heavy loads to induce changes in aerobic capacity and build muscle strength and mass. This doesn’t mean you should stop lifting those heavy weights or completing HIIT sessions, but perhaps provides an alternative stimulus to keep on improving once you reach a performance plateau or could be used as an in-season training modality to reduce the stress placed on you or your athletes’ body.

This study was well written and provided some nice images of the BFR walking if you are interested in how to set it up, as well as the important results in easy to read graphs and tables. One limitation of the study was that there was no reporting of any additional training (skills training, weights etc) that may have been completed during the study. This may have had a huge impact on the results if the athletes were completing any additional exercise. It also would have been a better study design if they directly compared the change in VO2max with a group that completed a similar volume of high intensity aerobic exercise.

Image of the journal article

1 Comment

Filed under Sport Science Journal Club

Q&A with Dr Stephen Bailey, lecturer at Exeter University

For journal club we looked at the following beetroot juice research paper:

Lansley KE, Winyard JF, Fulford J, et al. Dietary nitrate supplementation reduces the O2 cost of walking and running: a placebo-controlled study. J Appl Physiol 2011; 110: 591-600.

I received lots of questions for the researcher, Dr Stephen Bailey, about his research. Stephen is a lecturer in exercise physiology at Exeter University. He has very kindly answered all of our questions and you can read the responses below.

Q. Your study only used 9 participants. Did you carry out a power calculation to calculate the minimum sample size for your study? Sarah Rossiter (Sport and Exercise Physiologist)

A. Yes, we calculated the number of participants required to detect significant differences by using the effect size reported in the initial study by Larsen et al. (2007).  We and others have since published a number of papers confirming these effects using 8-10 subjects.  This indicates that the sample size provided an appropriate level of statistical power to detect the physiological and performance changes after beetroot juice supplementation.

Q. Is there potential for beetroot juice to positively impact intermittent exercise? Kevin L Merry (lecturer in Sports and Exercise Science at Loughborough College)

A. We have previously shown that beetroot juice supplementation can reduce the ATP cost of muscle force production during high-intensity exercise (Bailey et al., 2010, Journal of Applied Physiology, 109, 135-148).  We showed that this reduced muscle phosphocreatine (PCr) utilisation and it might also have reduced muscle glycogen utilisation.  Since PCr and glycogen are important substrates for anaerobic metabolism within the muscle, then a reduced utilisation of these substrates during exercise may increase the number of high-intensity bouts an individual can complete before these reserves attain low levels and performance is compromised.  In addition we also showed in this study that the accumulation of inorganic phosphate (Pi) and adenosine diphosphate (ADP), metabolites that are associated with the development of muscle fatigue, was lower.  Therefore the potential for sparing the limited anaerobic energy reserves and for lowering the accumulation of metabolites linked to the process of muscle fatigue after beetroot juice supplementation would be hypothesised to improve intermittent exercise performance.  While this hypothesis has yet to be empirically tested, we have anecdotal evidence from team sports players who are very positive that beetroot juice supplementation is capable of enhancing intermittent exercise performance.

Q. Would you expect to see significant improvements in performance the more endurance trained the athlete? James Bray (part-time exercise physiology PhD student)

A. There is some evidence showing that the plasma nitrite and nitrate concentrations might be higher in training compared to untrained humans.  Since beetroot juice supplementation is effective because of its ability to increase the plasma nitrite concentration, the scope for beetroot juice to be effective in trained athletes might be lower compared to untrained or lesser trained individuals.  Alternatively, a larger dose may be needed to provoke the physiological and performance benefits observed in less training individuals in trained athletes.  Moreover, trained athletes have better muscle oxygenation and since the conversion of nitrite to nitric oxide is enhanced when oxygen levels are lowered, it is possible that nitric oxide production from nitrite might be lower in this population.  At the moment the literature is equivocal with regards to the ergogenic effects of beetroot juice supplementation in trained endurance athletes.  It is possible that the extent to which beetroot juice supplementation is ergogenic in athletes might be dependent on the interaction between the nitrate dose, the event duration and intensity, and the training status of the athletes.  Therefore, further research is required before beetroot juice supplementation can or cannot be recommended as an ergogenic aid for athletes.

Q. Should one drink beetroot juice if they experience GI issues? Perhaps the night before? Aaron Paige (Aspiring exercise physiologist and athletic trainer)

A. The subjects who have participated in our studies to date have not reported any significant GI troubles so this is likely to be uncommon following the ingestion of the volumes of beetroot juice consumed in our studies.  For individuals who do experience GI issues, you could have them use the new concentrated beetroot juice shots which provide the same nitrate dose for a lower volume (70 ml rather than 500 ml).  We know that plasma nitrite attains peak values 2.5 hours after beetroot juice ingestion and declines thereafter.  Therefore, is someone was going to drink beetroot juice the night before, they would still need to top up, perhaps with a couple of shots, 2.5 hours before competition.  

Q. When supplementing beetroot, is there a minimum time delay from seeing the effects of beetroot on performance? In your study the supplement was taken on 6 days, where others studies, I believe, have seen the effects of beetroot after 2 hours. Tom Watkiss (Sport and Exercise Physiology MSc student)

A. The plasma nitrite concentration peaks approximately 2.5 hours after consuming beetroot juice so we would not expected to see any changes less than 2 hours after drinking beetroot juice.  We have shown that supplementation with beetroot juice for 15 days appears to be more effective than 6 days and a single dose ingested 2.5 hours prior to exercise, so longer supplementation may be more beneficial.

Q. In terms of practicality for athletes, is there a limit to its effects? I.e. distance of race or total of race. Tom Watkiss (Sport and Exercise Physiology MSc student)

A. We have shown that beetroot juice supplementation is effective during event durations of ~6-20 minutes, but it is not known whether this applies to longer duration athletic events.  There is some evidence to show that the plasma nitrite levels decline during exercise so, while beetroot juice supplementation can elevate plasma nitrite levels, this will eventually be used up during exercise.  Therefore, it might be useful during long-distance endurance events to top up with beetroot juice shots during the race.

Q. From previous experience of research with BR (Beet it), some of my participants / athletes have anecdotally stated that they struggled with the palatability of BR & saw that as a potential limiter to usage. As you conclude that the positive physiological effects are due to high content levels of nitrate & you now have a mechanism of extracting nitrate, are there any plans to examine the potential for making a more palatable, high nitrate drink to compare against the effects of BR? Dylan Merkett (Health Editor at Bupa)

A. For individuals who struggle with the palatability of beetroot juice, you could have them use the new concentrated beetroot juice shots which provide the same nitrate dose for a lower volume (70 ml rather than 500 ml).  It is also important to note that it is the nitrate in the beetroot juice, not beetroot juice per se, that is responsible for the effects.  Therefore, the consumption of other foods rich in nitrates such as lettuce (particularly rocket), spinach, radishes etc., could be an alternative method to provoke these responses.  However, one thing that individuals should avoid is the uncontrolled consumption of nitrite and nitrate salts since this is dangerous and potential fatal (http://jap.physiology.org/content/111/2/616.long).  Accordingly, dietary interventions should be used to obtain these effects.

Many thanks to everyone who asked a question and to Stephen for responding to the questions and giving us a better insight into beetroot juice and exercise.


Filed under Nutrition

Does dietary nitrate supplementation reduce the O2 cost of walking and running?

We looked at the paper below for this sport science journal club. It focused on the effects of beetroot (BR) juice on running and walking.

Lansley KE, Winyard JF, Fulford J, et al. Dietary nitrate supplementation reduces the O2 cost of walking and running: a placebo-controlled study. J Appl Physiol 2011; 110: 591-600.

What was the aim of the paper?

Beetroot juice has previously been shown to reduce resting blood pressure, and the oxygen cost of submaximal exercise. Research has also shown that it can increase tolerance to high intensity cycling. The researchers had three main aims for this study:

1. Were the physiological effects of BR due to the high nitrate content?
2. How much of the increase of nitrate bioavailability with BR may increase mitochondrial biogenesis (process by which new mitochondria are formed in the cells)?
3. Extend the previous findings to walking and running.

The researchers hypothesised that BR supplementation would increase plasma nitrate and reduce blood pressure, reduce oxygen cost of walking and running and increase exercise tolerance and increase muscle oxidative capacity. The researchers were from the University of Exeter.

What did the study involve?

Nine men were recruited for the study and after the researchers determined their VO2 max and the participants completed ‘step’ running tests, they were assigned to either consume 0.5 l/day of nitrate rich BR (containing around 6.2 mmol of nitrate) or nitrate depleted BR for 6 days. During days 4 and 5, participants repeated the step running tests and on day 6 they performed knee-extension exercise tests. The participants were told to drink the BR slowly, 3 hours before exercise.

What were the main results?

The researchers found that mitochondrial oxidative capacity was not different between placebo and beetroot but the oxygen cost of walking, moderate intensity running and severe intensity running was reduced by BR. They also found that time to exhaustion during severe intensity running was increased.

What can we take from it?

This was a really interesting and very in-depth study that adds to what we already know about BR juice and exercise. The findings suggest that short-term dietary supplementation with nitrate rich BR juice reduced the oxygen cost of walking and moderate and severe running, and increased time to exhaustion. An important point in this study was that the researchers were able to use nitrate depleted placebo juice, which made sure that the protocol was double-blind and the participants did not know which juice they were drinking.  The researchers believe that the results may be important for people with cardiovascular problems as the BR was shown to reduce the oxygen cost of walking, which may significantly improve their quality of life.

I really enjoyed reading this study and thought it was well written and included lots of detail, such as the subjects abstaining from using chewing gum throughout the study. The use of the randomised, crossover design ensured that the participants acted as their own controls which helped to reduce bias. I liked the use of illustrations to show the exercise test protocol and the tables and figures. I’m looking forward to reading more research in this area. The author from this paper has answered a number of questions about his research for sport science journal club, which you can read here.



Filed under Nutrition, Sport Science Journal Club

Functional movement is negatively associated with weight status and positively associated with physical activity in British primary school children

The paper for this journal club was related to functional movement, physical activity and weight in children.

Duncan M, Stanley M. Functional movement is negatively associated with weight status and positively associated with physical activity in
British primary school children. Journal of Obesity 2012.

What was the aim of the paper?

The researchers were aware that there was a lack of research on the structural and functional limitations of excess weight in children. The aim of their research was to look at the relationship between physical activity, functional movement and weight in children. The authors were from the Department of Biomolecular and Sport Science in Coventry University in the UK.

What did the study involve?

58 British school children (mean age of 10.7 years, over 80% Caucasian) were recruited for the study. The researchers measured body mass and height and calculated BMI. The children were classed as overweight or obese according to the International Obesity Taskforce (IOTF) criteria. Physical activity was measured using pedometers which the children used over four days (2 week days and 2 weekend days). Functional movement was assessed using the Functional Movement Screen (FMS). This included seven tests (deep squat, hurdle step, in-line lunge, shoulder mobility, active straight leg raise, truck stability push-up and rotary stability) and the children were given three trials of each test. The researchers took the highest score from the three trials for each test and used this to create a FMS score.

What were the main results?

The researchers found that FMS was negatively associated with BMI and positively related to physical activity. Normal weight children score significantly better for FMS score compared to overweight or obese children. BMI and physical activity were also significant predictors of FMS score, with BMI being a stronger predictor.

What can we take from it?

This was an enjoyable study to read with a simple research design. It would have been good to see a larger sample size with children of different ages and from different parts of the UK, not just Coventry. I would have also liked to have seen a power calculation for the sample size needed for this study.

The research design was explained clearly, but I feel like specific details about times of measurement of BMI, FMS and physical activity levels would have been helpful to give a better insight into the research. As Jon mentions, it’s well-known that BMI may not be completely accurate for body fat measurement, but the author Mike said that they used it because it’s used as part of the national child measurement programme. Mike also believes that he probably wouldn’t have reached a different conclusion if they had measured adiposity directly.

I’ve picked out the following comments about the research.

  • Although the sample size was small, it gives a positive indication that this topic requires further research, with larger sample sizes. 
  • It may also be relevant to extend the objectives of this study to a wider age range, such as 8 to 16 year olds, to compare any differences between FMS score and physical activity across an age range.
  • My concern is how can a test (FMS) be utilized for two different populations and come to useful and reliable conclusions?
  • Can the level of obesity be more categorically reported than BMI?
  • I think it would be interesting to see whether an intervention of exercise, diet, or exercise + diet significantly improves FMS score, to see what extent functional skill or functional limitation effect movement.
  • we should consider the implications of reduced functional movement, altered gait, and lower body loads on the design of exercise prescriptions in overweight children.

Overall, this was a simple study that adds to the little research that has been carried out on physical activity, functional movement and obesity in children. Mike now wants to see what impact a physical activity intervention might have on children’s obesity and functional movement.

You can see more comments, questions and answers from fellow Sport Scientists and the author Mike here.


Filed under Physical activity and children

Sudden cardiac death in athletes: Outcomes in athletes with marked ECG repolarization abnormalities

This journal club looked at a paper related to sudden cardiac death in athletes. It’s a very topical subject at the moment, with the press reporting about cardiovascular events in the Boston marathon and the tragic death of a 30 year old lady at the London marathon.

Pelliccia A, Di Paolo FM, Quattrini FM, et al. Outcomes in athletes with marked ECG repolarization abnormalities. N Engl J Med 2008. 10: 152-61.

What was the aim of the paper?

It’s known that young athletes may have abnormal ECGs without evidence of cardiac disease. However, the question remains as to whether these abnormal ECG patterns represent the initial stage of cardiovascular disease, or are they just expressions of athletic conditioning? The researchers wanted to look at the long-term outcomes in athletes with ECGs characterised by abnormal repolarization.

What did the study involve?

This was a matched case-control study. The researchers reviewed ECG data from a database of 12,550 athletes evaluated at the Institute of Sports Medicine and Science in Italy. In Italy it is required by law for all athletes to undergo screening to rule out cardiovascular disease that could be associated with an increased risk during training and competition. The researchers identified 81 athletes that had abnormal ECGs (showing marked repolarization abnormalities) and excluded those that had evidence of structural heart disease. They compared this data with a control group of 229 athletes who had normal ECGs and no evidence of cardiovascular disease.

What were the main results?

Five of the 81 athletes with abnormal ECGs had a disease of the heart muscle called cardiomyopathy (one died suddenly at the age of 24 from undetected heart disease, three developed cardiomyopathy after an average of 12 years and one after 9 years of follow-up). None of the 229 control athletes had a cardiac event.

What can we take from it?

The researchers concluded that abnormal ECGs in apparently healthy athletes may show the initial expression of underlying heart disease that may be associated with adverse outcomes.

I really enjoyed reading this research paper and found it very informative. It addressed a very important topic and helped to add to what we already know about sudden cardiac death in athletes. The research question was well-developed, stating the population (young athletes), the parameter (abnormal ECGs) and the outcome (clinical outcomes). The study design was simple, with the researchers analysing data from a large number of athletes who were screened at the Institute of Sports Science and Medicine. We know that randomised controlled trials give the most robust evidence, however this was not ethically appropriate. The researchers didn’t state who analysed the ECGs but it was good to see that the control group were selected from the same database of athletes.

I’ve picked out the following comments about the research.

  • The article by Pelliccia and colleagues is a well written piece of work and identifies some ECG abnormalities that may contribute to sudden cardiac death in these athletes.
  • Is pre-screening really worth it if athletes continue to play on despite their awareness?!

Overall, this research shows that ECGs showing marked abnormalities can be useful for identifying those athletes who are at risk of subsequent development of heart disease. However, as Carla mentions in her comments, even if athletes knew that they were at risk of heart disease, would they give it all up to prevent such events?

1 Comment

Filed under Sport Science Journal Club, Sudden cardiac death

The effects of intermittent hypoxic training on aerobic capacity and endurance performance in cyclists

For this journal club we looked at the following journal article:

Czuba M, Waskiewicz Z, Zajac A, et al. The effects of intermittent hypoxic training on aerobic capacity and endurance performance in cyclists. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 2011; 10: 175-183

What was the aim of the paper?

The aim of the paper was to look at the efficacy of intermittent hypoxic training at 95% of lactate threshold on endurance performance and aerobic capacity in cyclists. The authors did not include a hypothesis. The research was carried out by scientists at the Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Eduction in Poland.

What did the study involve?

The researchers recruited 20 male elite cyclists and randomly divided them into a hypoxia (H) group (who trained in a normobaric hypoxic environment, O2= 15.2%) and a control group (normoxia environment). The experiment consisted of baseline testing, followed by three weeks of progressive training and one week recovery in which the training load was significantly reduced, and then post-testing. The testing involved taking resting blood samples, body mass and body composition. This was then followed by a progressive cycle ergometer test to determine VO2max and lactate threshold and the researchers measured heart rate, minute ventilation, oxygen uptake and expired carbon dioxide. After 24 hour rest, the participants performed a 30km time trial and heart rate, blood lactate, speed, cadence and power were measured. The training programme was the same for both groups and involved three sessions per week with a 15 minute warm-up, 30-40 minutes of core training (30 min at 95% lactate threshold workload in 1st week, 35 min in second week and 40 min in third week) and a 15 minute cool down. Intensity for the control group was 100% of lactate threshold workload.

What were the main results?

The researchers results showed that after the three week training period, there was a significant increase in VO2max, maximum workload and lactate threshold workload during the incremental test in the hypoxia group compared to the control group. The results also indicated a significant reduction in the time of the trial and a significant increase in average generated power and speed during the time trial in the hypoxia group. However, there was no difference in red blood cell count, haemoglobin concentration and haematocrit value. The authors conclude that intermittent hypoxic training at lactate threshold intensity improves aerobic capacity and endurance performance at sea level.

What can we take from it?

I enjoyed reading this paper and agree with Ben that it had some very interesting points. The research question was focussed and the study design was suitable for the research question, but it was unfortunate that they did not include a hypothesis.

The main point that I want to highlight is that the researchers did not use a repeated measures, crossover design and therefore the participants did not serve as their own control, which means that the groups could have been unbalanced and it may have introduced bias to the results. The training period of three weeks was fairly short, but the training sessions were quite long (around an hour) and at a high intensity, which may not be suitable for the general population. However, as Carla mentions, a three week training programme that improves sea level performance could be appealing to athletes to gain a competitive edge.

I’ve picked out the following comments about the research.

  • The paper fails to find any changes to haematological parameters, suggesting that this intervention was not harsh enough to bring about significant erythropoiesis.
  • Future research should use the same intervention, but have more follow-up analysis and include muscle biopsies to measure for changes in skeletal muscle.
  • The only problem I can see with the present study is that the training only went for 3 weeks, it does not state what type of program the athletes come off, as a supercompensation effect could have accounted for the increases in power, lactate threshold and such.
  • This paper highlights that hypoxia is a complimentary tool to training and not the primary stimulus.



Filed under Altitude training, Sport Science Journal Club

Low-volume high-intensity interval training induces performance and metabolic adaptations that resemble ‘all-out’ sprint interval training

For journal club we looked at the following paper:

Bayati M, Farzad, B, Gharakhanlou R, et al. A practical model of low-volume high-intensity interval training induces performance and metabolic adaptations that resemble ‘all-out’ sprint interval training. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2011; 10:571-76

What was the aim of the paper?

The researchers wanted to compare a sprint interval training (SIT) protocol (3-4 x 30 seconds ‘all out’ effort with 4 minutes recovery) versus a high intensity interval training (HIT) protocol (6-10 x 30 seconds with 125% Pmax with 2 minutes recovery) . They hypothesised that the training induced changes would be the same between the two protocols. The research was carried out by researchers from the Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences at Tarbiat Modares University.

What did the study involve?

The researchers recruited 24 male graduate students who were habitually active. After a familiarisation trial, the participants carried out a graded exercise test on a cycle ergometer to measure VO2max and power at VO2 max (Pmax). They also did a test to determine the time to exhaustion at Pmax by cycling to fatigue at a self-selected cadence. Finally they carried out a 30 second Wingate test to analyse peak power output (PPO), mean power output (MPO) and total work (Wtot).

The researchers then assigned the participants to one of three groups; HIT, SIT or a control group. The participants trained 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Following the training intervention, the three tests above were repeated. Blood lactate was measured at rest and three and 20 minutes after the Wingate test only.

What were the main results?

The researchers found that following the four week training programme, Pmax, VO2 max and PPO were significantly increased in both training groups compared to the control group. MPO increased significantly with SIT compared with the control group, but MPO did not change significantly with the HIT group. Blood lactate was significantly different in both training groups compared to the control group.

What can we take from it?

I enjoyed reading this study because I am very interested in the research area, especially after watching it on BBC Horizon. It was an easy paper to read and had some good points to take away from it. The researchers clearly stated a research question and hypothesis, and used a simple study design to test the research question. They used a quick and easy training protocol that would be easy for the general population to carry out and because the researchers used participants that were not athletes, it made the results relevant for the general population. The use of a control group in the study helped to eliminate bias and they used a relatively large number of participants compared to similar research (although they did not state if they had used a power calculation for sample size).

Although the paper had many good points, there were a number of areas that I questioned. The training was only carried out over a period of four weeks and I would have liked to see the long-term effects of the training protocols. The study was not a repeated measures design and the researchers matched the subjects, but they did not state the criteria for this and also did not say how they randomised the participants into the groups. I would have liked to have seen how the diet and physical activity adherence was measured. I also wonder why the researchers only measured blood lactate. They could have measured other markers of fitness, such as heart rate and also perceptual measures, including rating of perceived exertion. Finally, this training protocol would not be suitable for people who had an existing medical condition.

The following points that Dan made about the research are very valid.

  • Are the two adequately distinctive enough to warrant such investigation? 125% Pmax for obese, unfit and/or unaccustomed individuals is still a big ask and questionably unsustainable for long-term exercise prescription. As well as being difficult to quantify this intensity in real life.
  • With regard to adding to current literature, relevant is the finding that lower intensity (125% Pmax vs. ‘all out’) but more repetitions (6-10 vs. 3-5) provide similar metabolic and performance gains.
  • Would be interesting if subjects were to see comparable improvements with the comparison of HIT and SIT protocols used in the current study against the utilisation of those rest periods to conduct low intensity recovery exercise (interval training)

Overall, I enjoyed reading this study but would have liked it to be a bit ‘meatier’ and feel like some important points were missing.

1 Comment

Filed under High intensity training, Sport Science Journal Club